Crerar Review: Public Scrutiny in Scotland

The Report by Professor Lorne Crerar of the “Independent review of regulation, audit, inspection and complaints handling of public services in Scotland” was published on Tuesday 25th September 2007 on http://www.scrutinyreview.org/

The Crerar review concludes there is widespread agreement that Scotland’s scrutiny system is too complex, costly and burdensome on public bodies. From the evidence gathered, Crerar finds that the scrutiny system doesn’t necessarily scrutinise the right things, has grown in a piecemeal fashion and requires strategic co-ordination.

The Crerar report short to medium term recommendations

• a radical increase in the sharing of information and co-ordination
between bodies.
• a renewed focus on users of services
• involving service users in standards setting
• an increased role for parliament
• fewer scrutiny organisations
• accessible reports by scrutiny bodies
• proportionality - focusing on poorer performing service providers and higher risk situations

Crerar Report - One scrutiny body for all?

In the longer term the report proposes moving to one national scrutiny body, one audit body, and one complaints handling body for the whole public sector.

Crerar report - other recommendations

The Crerar report also recommends that –
• Core risk criteria should be agreed by Ministers and agreed by Parliament to assess the need for current and future scrutiny
• Ministers should redistribute resources and functions from within NHS QIS,
the Scottish Government’s Health Directorates and the Care Commission in relation to private hospitals and related treatment – to an independent external scrutiny organisation
• All external scrutiny organisations should have one “status” with clearly defined lines of accountability to Parliament and to Ministers.
• Where scrutiny is needed, if there is more than one existing organisation, only one should be asked to do the work and be fully responsible and accountable. Creating a new scrutiny organisation should not be an option.

Crerar Report: Principles of scrutiny

The focus should shift to self assessment, supported by risk based, proportionate
external scrutiny. As service provider performance management improves in quality
and ability to reassure users, public and elected members, scrutiny can become
more proportionate to the risks, which in turn frees up delivery organisations to focus
further on improving their front line services. The scrutiny framework should –
􀂃 focus on the needs of the people who use services being scrutinised,
􀂃 drive improvement,
􀂃 ensure that public money is used as efficiently and effectively as possible.
The principles behind the system are for a simplified scrutiny landscape, with a
proportionate and co-ordinated approach.

Crerar Report: The future for Scrutiny bodies

The report does not make specific recommendations in relation to the future of particular scrutiny bodies as this was not the remit of the review. However the report does recommend that in the longer term there should be the development of one scrutiny body and this will have implications for a number of existing bodies.

Crerar Report: A Risk based and Outcome focussed approach to Scrutiny?

The report argues strongly for scrutiny which is risk based and which moves away from scrutinising inputs and processes and towards measuring outcomes.

The full report can be downloaded at http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/82980/0053065.pdf